Motus Bioengineering Inc.
|
Sensor
Comparison
Gyroscope
-
The
best
approach
- Measures
rotational motion -- human motion is rotational about joints.
- Not
influenced by gravity.
- Both
frequency & magnitude information accurate down to DC (zero
frequency).
- Only a
single integration is needed to obtain angular displacement.
- High signal
to noise ratio.
- High
dynamic range.
- Solid state
gyros (with no spinning wheels) do not influence motion of subject
being measured.
- No intimate
electrical contact with subject.
|
Accelerometer - inferior to Gyroscope (more info- click here)
- Measures
linear
motion
&
gravity concurrently.
Results cannot be
decoupled without gyros. Does not measure human rotational motion.
- Signal
magnitude corrupted by gravity.
- Frequency
data
good
but bandwidth often not down to
DC.
- Difficult
second integration required to obtain displacement.
- Low signal
to noise ratio piezoelectric accels. High for servo accels but includes
gravity component.
- High
dynamic range.
- Piezoelectric
accels
can
be
very
small with no influence; servo accels much larger.
- No intimate
electrical contact with subject.
|
Electromyogram (EMG) - inferior to Gyroscope
- Measures
electrical current associated with muscular action. Does not measure
movement directly.
- Not
influenced by gravity.
- Frequency
information good but magnitude less repeatable. Contact
resistance is a significant variable.
- Displacement,
velocity
and
power
cannot
be obtained.
- Low
signal to noise ratio. Sensitive to remote muscle activity and
interference.
- Low
dynamic range.
- Small
sensing elements available with no influence on motion.
- Intimate
electrical contact with subject required.
|