Motus
Bioengineering
Inc.
|
Sensor Comparison
Gyroscope - The best approach
- Measures
rotational motion -- human motion is rotational about joints.
- Not
influenced by gravity.
- Both
frequency & magnitude information accurate down to DC (zero
frequency).
- Only a single
integration is needed to obtain angular displacement.
- High signal
to noise ratio.
- High dynamic
range.
- Solid state
gyros (with no spinning wheels) do not influence motion of subject
being measured.
- No intimate
electrical contact with subject.
|
Accelerometer
- inferior to Gyroscope (more
info- click here)
-
Measures linear motion & gravity
concurrently.
Results cannot be
decoupled without gyros. Does not measure human rotational motion.
-
Signal magnitude corrupted by gravity.
-
Frequency data good but bandwidth often not down to
DC.
- Difficult
second integration required to obtain displacement.
- Low signal to
noise ratio piezoelectric accels. High for servo accels but includes
gravity component.
- High dynamic
range.
- Piezoelectric
accels can be very small with no influence; servo accels much
larger.
- No intimate
electrical contact with subject.
|
Electromyogram
(EMG) - inferior to Gyroscope
- Measures
electrical current associated with muscular action. Does not measure
movement directly.
- Not influenced
by gravity.
- Frequency
information good but magnitude less repeatable. Contact resistance
is a significant variable.
- Displacement,
velocity and power cannot be obtained.
-
Low signal to noise ratio. Sensitive to remote muscle activity and interference.
-
Low dynamic range.
- Small sensing
elements available with no influence on motion.
- Intimate
electrical contact with subject required.
|